[ad_1]
As the prospect of returning to something resembling our former lives slowly takes shape in our collective imaginations—and in the country’s halls of power–we must consider: how will we balance our individual well-being against the larger risks of our response to society? That is, how will we weigh economic recovery against public health, if that is, in fact, the trade-off? The question rises before each of us, as people. It rises before our communities, our countries and the world. What is the pandemic telling us about who we are?
It seems as though we’ve never been more alone and more together. That stark paradox defines the moment. We have been instructed to stay away from one another. But the cliché “we’re all in this together” has never seemed more accurate.
Even in the Middle Ages, the plague didn’t circumnavigate the planet in a matter of weeks, as this tenacious coronavirus has, forcing every nation to scramble to safety.
Then there are the people giving our lives a semblance of normality– the delivery workers, the grocery store clerks, the postal workers, sanitation crews, all at their posts, keeping our struggling economy from expiring.
Around the world, people applaud the caregivers. We find comfort in their heroism. It makes us feel better about our world; perhaps unconsciously, about ourselves. They are us, we think. But are they you?
Are we heroes, too? We’re doing our best. Maybe. We have proven resourceful, innovative, compassionate. Many, perhaps most of us, keep an eye on our friends and our family. We stay in touch, we call, we video chat on Zoom. We make sure our loved ones are staying safe, sane.
And yet, much of this is self-protective, a defense of a concentric circle—our cushion of stability–only slightly larger than ourselves. That’s natural– normal–but hardly selfless. Do we reach beyond our circle, do we worry about people we don’t know; do we urge our country to pitch in to prevent an even greater calamity in other parts of the world?
Little of that has happened. The pandemic struck during a time of nationalist introversion, of “Me First,” damn the rest. If ever we needed global leadership, it is now. There is none. Every country is looking out for itself. The role once filled by the United States is vacant, leaving humanitarians largely pleading into the abyss at a time when the magnitude of the expected need is so overwhelming, that only a massive multinational response can do the job.
Jonathan Sacks, the former Chief Rabbi of the UK, says, “We’re all eating the bread of affliction now,” as Jews around the world celebrate a Passover like no other in thousands of years of Jewish history.
Still, many of us — the lucky ones — have been able to keep a post-apocalyptic version of normal times in our upended lives. One can almost, almost, imagine life going on like this indefinitely if it had to. It’s remarkable how much still functions under the circumstances.
There’s much that we can take pride in; the resourcefulness, the creativity, are visible in our daily online connections, in the messages we receive, in the inventions, the ideas, and the quest for solutions to the unexpected problems of our shared condition.
Are we discovering that we’re adaptable, malleable beings, skilled at adjusting to unexpected circumstances, or are we discovering our inner hermit, capable of living with minimal actual—not virtual–human contact? How difficult will it be to re-enter a world full of people? And when will that happen? Can it happen now that the government has defaulted on its promise of widespread testing?
Who are we? The question is being answered day by day, person by person, country by country. As we puzzle over it, we would do well to remember what happened after the last time the planet faced an economic cataclysm. Indeed, it is not an idle philosophical question for people caught in pandemic stay-at-home orders, with too much time on their hands.
The Great Depression gave us the 1930s, bitterness, despair, demagogues, culminating in a calamity even greater than the initial economic collapse. It, too, showed us who we are.
We don’t know how this will end, but we should consider who we are, who we want to be, and what happens if we give the wrong answer.
[ad_2]
Source link