[ad_1]

“We are surprised by your announcement that the Committees will not receive testimony from the anonymous intelligence community employee whose complaint initiated the so-called impeachment inquiry,” wrote Reps. Jim Jordan of the House Oversight Committee, Devin Nunes of the House Intelligence Committee, and Michael McCaul of the Foreign Affairs Committee in a letter.

“You had earlier committed that the employee would provide ‘unfiltered’ testimony ‘very soon’ only to reverse course following revelations that the employee had a bias against President Donald Trump and that you had received a secret, early account of the allegations. As the so-called impeachment inquiry gathers information that contradicts the employee’s allegations, we ask that you arrange for the Committees to receive public testimony from the employee and all individuals he or she relied upon in formulating the complaint.”

The letter comes as the Democratic-led impeachment inquiry into the President continues to escalate with depositions of key witnesses in the investigation happening behind closed doors.
Democrats have said they will not bring the whistleblower in for public testimony given concerns about keeping the person’s identity secret. Attorneys for the whistleblower have said their client’s security is a priority as the President has said he wanted to know the whistleblower’s identity and has tried to discredit the individual.
CNN has previously reported the whistleblower went to staff of the House Intelligence Committee for guidance before filing the complaint. The New York Times was first to report that Schiff learned the outlines of the whistleblower’s concerns before the complaint was filed, but never met with the whistleblower.
CNN previously reported that a source familiar with efforts to protect the whistleblower’s personal safety said that a group of retired Navy SEALs have come forward to offer assistance. While the extent of that assistance remains unclear, the source suggested that the SEALs could be used to provide personal security at places like the whistleblower’s home.

[ad_2]

Source link