[ad_1]
“I am informing you now that the Department may not lawfully fulfill the Committee’s request,” Mnuchin wrote in his one-page letter, written in consultation with lawyers from the Department of Justice.
The denial comes after two missed deadlines by the Treasury secretary, who again in his letter said the request by House Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal under an obscure statute of tax law is “unprecedented,” arguing it raises “serious constitutional questions” that could have dire consequences for taxpayer privacy.
Trump has refused to release his tax information, first as a candidate and now as president, breaking a precedent going back to Watergate.
An administration official familiar with the matter said the Trump administration is not backing down in the fight over the President’s tax returns.
“It appears the Justice Department is prepared to litigate” the matter in the courts if Neal goes that route, the official said.
Neal said in a statement Monday that he was still determining next steps.
“Today, Secretary Mnuchin notified me that the IRS will not provide the documents I requested under Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code,” Neal said. “I will consult with counsel and determine the appropriate response.”
The committee chairman could issue a subpoena on top of his request, or Democrats could move to hold the Treasury Secretary or IRS Commissioner for whom the original request was addressed to in contempt of Congress.
Some Democrats made clear Monday that they are eager to escalate, citing the Mueller report as well as the conviction of Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen.
“On a day when his former fixer heads to jail and his current fixer heads the Department of Justice, President Trump obstructs both Mueller and his tax returns from speaking for themselves,” Texas Democratic Rep. Lloyd Doggett said in a statement. “We need immediate legal action. We cannot allow this bad president to set bad precedent.”
The top Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee, Texas Rep. Kevin Brady, applauded the decision not to turn over Trump’s returns.
“After consulting with the Justice Department the Treasury Department has come to the firm conclusion that we have known since day one: this request from House Democrats to weaponize the tax code for purely political reasons is illegitimate and should be treated as such,” Brady said in a statement. “This politically motivated abuse of the law violates our Constitution — and serves no legislative purpose. Abusing the tax writing Committee’s authority to go after a political enemy sets a dangerous precedent, and the Administration is right not to go along with it.”
The Justice Department has declined to comment on the matter.
The fight over the request may ultimately to lead to a court fight — which would be a rare example of Congress suing the executive branch for information. The Trump administration is already stonewalling other Democratic committee chairman on everything from the Mueller report to interviews with former White House counsel Don McGahn.
Neal made his initial ask for Trump’s tax information on April 3 after a months-long deliberation with staff, committee members and House lawyers.
Democrats on the tax-writing committee have argued that they have the ability to request Trump’s personal tax information under an obscure statute that permits three people to request personal tax information of any individual: the House Ways and Means Committee chairman, the Senate Finance Committee chairman and the chief of staff for the Joint Committee on Taxation.
The statute says that the secretary of the Treasury “shall furnish” it.
The statute has been used by Congress before, including in the Republican investigation under President Barack Obama into whether the IRS was discriminating against conservative groups applying for non-profit status. Requests for information using the law are also made on a regular basis for research purposes.
Neal has argued that he needs Trump’s taxes in order to conduct oversight of the IRS’s presidential audit program to both understand how the IRS is using the program and to see if the program needs to be codified into law.
But Mnuchin has asserted the “unprecedented” request raises “serious constitutional issues” that could have dire consequences for taxpayer privacy and has consulted with the Justice Department on the matter.
The Treasury secretary has also raised concerns that setting such a precedent could be “potentially weaponizing” the IRS.
The Massachusetts Democrat has previously indicated that defying his request would be interpreted as noncompliance and lead to an escalation of a standoff between the Trump administration and House Democrats.
In interviews last month, acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney told Fox News that there was no world in which Democrats would get the President’s tax returns.
Democrats are up against a barrage of denied requests from the administration, forcing leadership into tough decisions about what oversight priorities are worth pursuing in court.
House Democrats are lodged in an all-out-battle with the Department of Justice after the agency refused to hand over an unredacted Mueller report by Wednesday’s deadline. That was despite a subpoena from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler. Nadler has said he plans to hold the Attorney General in contempt of Congress if the report is not turned over in upcoming days.
Trump’s personal lawyers also sued last week to block banks and an accounting firm from turning over Trump’s financial records to the House Financial Services, House Intelligence and House Oversight Committees, a move that has led some Democratic chairs to question what the President has to hide.
“Whether it is refusing to sit down in an interview with Mueller or whether it is constantly obstructing justice by trying to stop testimonies and stop people from cooperating, whether it is filing a lawsuit, he obviously has something to hide,” House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters said last week.
Waters’s committee has subpoenaed at least 9 financial institutions with ties to the President.
“He’s obviously afraid that we are going to learn more about his relationships with Deutsche Bank, more about his bank records, perhaps, more about whether or not there is money laundering that has been involved in some ways. We have enough information and we have enough to help us to guide us moving forward to help us with these subpoenas,” Waters said.
CNN’s Jim Acosta contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
Source link